State Government rejects Draft LEP & DCP
Sometime during December 2005 the State Government returned
the draft Rural Plan to the council, without the necessary
section 65 certificate that would have permitted it to be placed
on public exhibition. In itself, this is a good outcome for
landholders affected by the proposals in the draft Plan, however
the government's intentions as revealed in the
Metropolitan Strategy are not encouraging.
Some details of the State Government's position are contained
in
a letter provided by the Council in response to a question.
It says:
"It is important to note that it appears
the non issue of the Section 65 certificate to exhibit is not an
indication that the Department is opposed to Council's
direction, it is more the process of delivery and timing in view
of the LEP reform and the evolution of the Metropolitan
Strategy. The Department will provide Council with further
correspondence on the Rural Lands Strategy suggesting a way
forward."
This removes landholders and those directly affected one step
further away from the decision-making process. It does not
respect the democratic process or ownership rights.
Further indication of the Government's intentions are
apparent in the Metropolitan Strategy.
- Page 8: "Contain Sydney’s urban footprint"
- Page 134: "Provide 60–70 per cent of new housing in
existing urban areas"
- Page 224: “...criteria for any future land release will
be strengthened and new urban development outside of areas
listed on the Government’s land release program tightly
restricted."
- Page 261: "...land [outside the growth centres] will be
maintained in its current land use for rural activities and
resource production..."
It is clear that the Government is continuing down the path
of urban consolidation - higher density, more congestion, loss
of privacy, and overloaded infrastructure. This is the opposite
of what most people want.
Permitting landholders in the urban fringe to subdivide their
large holdings into 5 acre lots is a sensible solution that
would provide greater choice, help keep prices affordable, and
respect the ownership rights of landholders. |